The Complexity of Moral Relativism

Moral relativism is a term that is thrown around quite frequently in today's society. It's a philosophy that suggests that moral truths are relative to the individual or culture that holds them. This can be a difficult concept to grasp, as it essentially suggests that there are no universal moral truths. Instead, what is considered right or wrong varies from person to person.

On the surface, this may seem like a very open-minded and accepting philosophy. After all, if everyone is allowed to have their own moral code, then there is no need for judgement or disagreement. However, the reality is much more complex than that. The very idea of moral relativism is riddled with contradictions and problems that make it more of a hindrance than a helpful philosophy.

To start with, the idea that moral truths are relative to the individual or culture that holds them is inherently contradictory. If everyone is allowed to have their own moral code, then there can be no universal moral truths. However, the very idea of moral relativism suggests that the belief in moral relativism is itself a universal moral truth. In other words, the belief in no universal moral truths becomes a universal moral truth in and of itself.

This contradiction is evident in the way that moral relativism is often used. When someone suggests that morality is relative, what they are really saying is that only their own moral code matters. After all, if morality is truly relative, then there can be no way to criticize or judge someone else's moral code. However, the very act of suggesting that morality is relative is a form of judgement in and of itself. What this means is that moral relativism is essentially a way to justify one's own beliefs while dismissing those of others.

Another problem with moral relativism is that it assumes that all moral beliefs are created equal. In reality, some moral beliefs are more harmful than others. For example, the belief that it's okay to kill people for no reason is objectively harmful. When morality is viewed as relative, there is no way to acknowledge that some moral beliefs are better than others. This can lead to a lack of progress in society, as harmful or outdated beliefs are never challenged or reevaluated.

It's also worth noting that moral relativism can lead to a lack of accountability. If everyone is allowed to have their own moral code, then there is no way to hold individuals or cultures accountable for their actions. This can lead to a lack of justice, particularly in cases where individuals or societies are committing immoral acts. Without a shared set of moral truths, it becomes impossible to hold anyone accountable for their actions.

All of these issues highlight the complexity of moral relativism. While it may seem like an open-minded and accepting philosophy at first glance, it quickly becomes clear that it is riddled with contradictions and problems. The reality is that if morality is truly relative, then it becomes impossible to hold anyone accountable for their actions or to challenge harmful beliefs. As such, it's important to acknowledge the limitations of moral relativism and to instead strive towards a shared set of moral truths that can help guide us towards a better society.

¡Surprise Me!